Cybersecurity Discussion Post

Prepare a 300-word discussion post in response to the following: The presenter of the “Software Assurance” briefing, in 2012, called for organizations to “Build Security In”, and recommended certain approaches, processes and standards. Recent events, including the OPM break-in, would seem to indicate that this call has been, to at least some extent, ignored. Who is at fault? The software development community? Or consumers (including acquisition professionals) who judge software more by cost than by safety and security?

Need help
with your answer?

Get a professionally written paper with a 15% first-time customer discount.

Order now

Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you construct a well-thought-out discussion post for your cybersecurity assignment:

1. Understand the Context: Revisit the “Software Assurance” briefing of 2012 to understand the call to “Build Security In”. Familiarize yourself with the suggested approaches, processes, and standards. Conduct a brief research on the OPM break-in and other recent cybersecurity incidents.
2. Define Your Stance: Reflect on the question at hand: Who is at fault? The software development community or the consumers? It’s important to define your stance early in the process as it will guide your research and argument development.
3. Start with an Introduction: Begin your post by briefly summarizing the “Software Assurance” briefing and its call for security. Mention the recent events that indicate this call has been ignored.
4. Present Your Argument: In this section, present your stance. Depending on what you’ve chosen, argue whether the software development community or consumers are at fault. Support your argument with logical reasoning, examples, and data if available. Make sure your argument remains within the 300-word limit.
5. Consider the Other Side: While arguing for your stance, briefly acknowledge the counter-argument. This adds depth to your discussion and shows you’ve considered multiple perspectives.
6. Conclude Your Post: Wrap up your argument by summarizing your points. Restate your stance and provide a closing thought.
7. Review and Revise: Go over your discussion post. Look out for repetitive phrases or generic sentences and revise them to enhance the quality of your post. Make sure it stays on topic and maintains a clear focus.
8. Proofread: Finally, proofread your post. Check for spelling errors, punctuation mistakes, and grammatical inaccuracies. Ensure that your sentences flow naturally and coherently.

Remember, each discussion post is an opportunity to demonstrate your understanding of the topic. So, take your time to develop a strong, evidence-based argument. Good luck!